I cannot believe people still have the audacity to blatantly deny the science.

I wonder if they have the balls to look at people in the face and say what they say, instead of being a keyboard warrior about it.

Sceptism is another. Though, that is also starting to lose favour, when you factor in the number of human casualties and fatalities; property damage; $ costs; loss of animal life/biodiversity, etc.

More frequent occurrences of these natural disasters gives an increasing compelling argument to adopt the precautionary principle. However, the dilemma is doing it in a way that does not bankrupt people, especially vulnerable ones.